An Experiment in Selling Products Online using Pay What It’s Worth Pricing

An Experiment in Selling Products Online using Pay What It’s Worth Pricing

After Christmas Sale

I’m curious about selling products online using PWIW and how it can work best. So, about six months ago I turned some communication tools I’d created over the years into products and began selling them in my store using PWIW.

Using PWIW for an Online Store

For my experiment, I wanted to figure out a strong way of selling a product online using PWIW. My first task (I felt) was to find software to help me with the buying and selling of my products. I needed a shopping cart tool to enable the sales transaction and to provide the product to buyers after sale. After doing research I decided upon using e-junkie. I have been happy with this decision.

The second decision I needed to make was how I was going to employ the e-junkie shopping cart with PWIW pricing. As with most online shopping carts, while it allows the customer to set the price of the item (often called a donation), it also requires the seller to set a suggested price.

Suggested Prices Signify Something

One of those things they can signify is what I think the thing I’m selling is worth. And for this experiment, that’s not what I wanted to do. I wanted you alone to decide what the product is worth to you.

But this was not, and is not, an option currently with online shopping carts — to set NO suggested price — so I needed to set the suggested price at something. The value I decided to use (for every product’s suggested price) was what I felt was a ridiculously low value ($0.07). My hope was this suggested price signified, please think about what you value this at because this price is clearly not a fair one.

It was my hypothesis that $0.07 was such an insignificant value to give/pay that it would be altered by each buyer. Most of us would not feel good giving $0.07 to a person in need, nor as a tip for service. And what can we puchase for that amount, outside of loose candy?

Despite this truth about the value of $0.07, my experiment yielded a handful of people that gave this amount to a faceless shopping cart in return for a communication tool created by me in support of them.

(It should be noted that no profit is made from online sales roughly less than $0.50 due to PayPal’s costs to process the transaction.)

A Curious Result

This is not to say there hasn’t been customers that have given fairly, despite the $0.07 suggested price. The fair are the majority in my PWIW experiment. But I found it curious, this minority that used the $0.07 suggested price as their price. They, I feel, are something to consider further.

I theorized there was something in my communication, namely the suggested price, that was contributing to this outcome. I wondered if by setting the suggested price very low, I was unconsciously sending a message about how I valued my work. What does it say about me and how I value my products when I set the suggested price low?

My Question

If these people exist, those that do not consciously consider how they value a product, and you want to sell something online using PWIW, how can you improve the exchange so that they behave more fairly?

My Theory

I’m theorizing that when the suggested price is set extremely low and there is no human connection, the communication it sends allows others to more easily react from a scarcity mindset and not value the product fairly, nor pay fairly.

Trying Something Different

Rather than setting the suggested price ridiculously low ($0.07) for each of the products in my store, I’ve set it ridiculously high ($777).

I am still hoping the suggested price will signify, please think about what you value this at because this price is clearly not a fair one. I am interested in how this higher suggested price affects the behaviour of those customers who are buying unconsciously.

In six months time, I’ll let you know what my experiment yields.

photo credit: kevin dooley

Another Thing I Think I Know About Personal Branding

Another Thing I Think I Know About Personal Branding

my poiny of view

My point-of-view matters.

Who am I?

Why am I here?

These questions matter to my personal brand.

The answers not so much. It’s not really about them. My value lies in the asking, in the questions.

Exploring my distinct point-of-view is good for me, and it’s good for business.

For knowing I matter matters deeply.

I am contributing to my brand’s wealth whenever I focus on discovering more about what makes me uniquely and invaluably me.

I can hear my point-of-view when I listen inwards, and when I listen to what is reflected back at me by my marketplace and my community.

Through these acts of asking and listening, I am uncovering my voice, and what’s inside of me and my brand. I am coming to understand why my point of view matters.

The more I grow to I understand my voice, the more clearly I can communicate it, and the better you can connect with it.

It’s brand magic. Made by me and my curiosity towards how I uniquely add value to the world.

One Thing I Think I Know About Personal Branding

One Thing I Think I Know About Personal Branding

NoMessage

There is no demand for my message.

Personal branding isn’t about packaging myself up into a pretty box and showing only the good and glowing. The whole me, not my tidy little message, is what people want and will see, whether I attempt to control it or not.

Establishing a message for myself, deciding on a pretense, trying to make you think what I want you to think about me, is not of benefit to me. And it’s not of interest to you. You don’t care about what I want to pretend to be.

My personal brand, it is my Marketing, and it’s not something I do to you. Marketing is something I do with you. It’s about creating great conversations.

That’s what’s really in demand. Connection.

My message, my pretense, can only prevent me from reaching that place with you.

 

Living in Creative Tension

Living in Creative Tension

photo credit gmacfadyen In Peter Senge’s book The Fifth Discipline, he writes,

The gap between vision and current reality is a source of energy. If there were no gap, there would be no need for any action to move towards the vision. We call this gap creative tension.”

It seems to me that when we allow ourselves to be in the gap between our dreams and our reality — to live in our own creative tension — we find our self most ripe with the solutions we need.

In this space we are living our questions, and the tense energy we create from “not knowing” activates our curiosity. This gap in “knowing” frees us to be the beginners we are.

If we can learn to enjoy the tension “not knowing”, and avoid those who “know” without questioning, I believe we can create our greatest possibility to discover our answers and close our gap between what is and what could be.

photo credit: garymacfadyen

I Just Don’t Know

I Just Don’t Know

Questions2
Does it make me less professional or less able if I don’t have THE answers?

Is it so bad to “not know”?

I know experts want to be seen as right — but I just want to see everything.

I’m curious.

I want to think beyond the answers spoon fed to me by others.

I want to think beyond their attempts to assert their “knowing.”

I want to see that there is never the right answer, only the answer that works best for me.

By “not knowing” I get to live in questioning.

In questioning I get to dig deep and uncover how and why I limit myself with “must be done’s”.

In my “not knowing” I get to move past my assertions of “THE answer” and move towards finding my true solutions.